Legal Opinion

Tunica County v. Gray

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 2009No. 2008-CA-00952-SCTPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMAR, Justice,

for the Court.

¶ 1. In this case we are called upon to determine whether Mississippi Code Section 41-39-5 imposes an actionable duty on county boards of supervisors with regard to disposition of unclaimed bodies. The trial court found that the statute creates an actionable duty, and that the Tunica County Board of Supervisors violated that duty by authorizing the cremation of an unclaimed body before the expiration of the statutory waiting period. The trial court awarded damages to the family of the deceased. Finding error, we reverse and render.

FACTS

¶2. On April 12, 2001,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. Memorial Hosp. of GulfportMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Aikerson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State ex rel. Hood v. Madison County ex rel. Madison County Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Bailey v. Al-MeftyMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Doe v. State Ex Rel. Mississippi Dept. of CorrectionsMississippi Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Samuel Wilcher, Jr. v. Lincoln County Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Frederick Bell v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  3. James D. Hobson, Jr. v. Chase Home Finance, L.L.C.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Bertram Hill v. City of Horn Lake, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Fanny Hudson v. City of Yazoo City, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API