Legal Opinion

State v. Stone

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 9, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Hamilton District Court.- — Hon. D. R. Hindman, Judge. Indictment for an assault with an intent to commit murder. There was a verdict of assault with intent to inflict a great bodily injury. Prom the judgment on the verdict, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

I. It is said that the evidence fails to show that the offense was committed in Hamilton county, where the indictment was returned. The case is before us on an abstract filed by the, appellant and an amendment by appellee. Both abstracts contain testimony, but there is no showing whatever as to whether they contain all the testimony, oi’, if not all, what part they contain. Under such a condition of the .record we could not reverse the case, even if we found the testimony in the record insufficient. State v. Carr, 43 Iowa, 418. We.have, however, examined the evidence as presented, and think…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Carr & BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. State v. McGuireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ek v. Phillips Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. People v. LlaugerSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API