State v. Carr & Brown
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Linn District Oourt. Indictment for robbery. Yerdict, guilty. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Seevers, Ci-i. J.
1. practice: I. The alleged errors will be considered in the order presented by counsel in- the argument. It is claimed the verdict is against the weight of the evidence; that the crime charged in the indictment has not been proved. The abstract does not state that it contains all the evidence, and counsel for the defendant in his argument states: “ I have printed all the material evidence, both on the part of the State and defense.” That counsel has so done according to his best judgment we do not doubt, but his opinion of what is material or not may possibly be erroneous.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hubbard v. EppersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. CarnagySupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- People v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Kenneth Williams v. Robert R. Kelly, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- State v. FogertySupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.