Legal Opinion
Alberelli v. Manning
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 27, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Per Curiam.
The evidence fully establishes that the moneys were loaned to defendant in contemplation and expectation of marriage. The action is barred and comes within sections 61-a and 61-b of article 2-A of the Civil Practice Act.
The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.
Hammer and Eder, JJ., concur; Shientag, J., dissents.
Judgment reversed, etc.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Easley v. NealNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Kaufman v. Rosenbach, New York County Courts1955