Legal Opinion

Pollock v. Federal Insurance Company

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 7, 2025No. 3:21-cv-09975Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THOMAS POLLOCK, et al., 7 Case No. 21-cv-09975-JCS Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER RE JOINT DISCOVERY 9 LETTER FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 10 Re: Dkt. No. 156 Defendant. 11 12 13 The parties have submitted a joint discovery letter regarding a dispute as to whether 14 Federal’s outside counsel, Eric Freed, who is lead co-counsel in this case, must produce 15 documents in response to Plaintiffs’ document requests. Federal contends Freed was retained 16 shortly before Plaintiffs initiated this action in order to provide legal advice…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Cedell v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. 2,022 Ranch L.L.C. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Tompkins v. Little Rock & Ft. S. Ry.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API