Legal Opinion

City National Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 2007No. B189240PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WILLHITE, J.

Plaintiff and appellant City National Corporation (City National) appeals from an order dismissing its tax refund action after the trial court sustained without leave to amend the Franchise Tax Board’s (FTB) demurrer to City National’s amended complaint. FTB asserted in its demurrer that the trial court was without jurisdiction to hear City National’s claim for a refund because City National had not yet paid approximately $50 million in proposed assessments for the tax years at issue. City National contends it had paid all taxes that were due at the time it filed its refund…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Thaler v. Household Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Hirsch v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. In Re Jack B. King Paula H. King, Debtors. Jack B. King Paula H. King v. Franchise Tax Board of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Pope Estate Co. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coziahr v. Otay Wat. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API