Legal Opinion

State v. Marsh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1977No. 26PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

The single question presented by this appeal is whether the trial judge erred by. failing to instruct the jury on the law of self-defense.

The trial judge must charge the jury on all substantial and essential features of a case which arise upon the evidence, even when, as here, there is no special request for the instruction. State v. Mercer, 275 N.C. 108, 165 S.E. 2d 328. State v. Todd, 264 N.C. 524, 142 S.E. 2d 154. Unquestionably, self-defense may become a substantial and essential feature of a criminal case, and when there is evidence from which it may be inferred that a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. DeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. HerbinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. JuarezSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Benton v. Hillcrest Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. FerrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API