Legal Opinion

Gilliland v. City of Clinton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 12, 1928No. 19200PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.

This is an appeal from an order of Hon. E. L. Richardson, special judge assigned in the district court of Custer county, dissolving a temporary injunction. The parties will be referred to herein as plaintiffs and defendants in the order in which they appeared in the trial court.

The record discloses the following facts: Clinton is a city of the first class, operating-under a charter form of government. The defendants, E. J. Meacham, George Hallifax and C. W. Goodwin, constitute the mayor and commissioners of the city. The plaintiffs are resident taxpayers and qualified electors of the city.

On…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Tecumseh v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Beauchamp v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Wadsworth v. NeherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Dean v. Wes Watkins Area Vocational-Technical School District, No. 25Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Groves v. Board of County Com'rs, Washita CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API