Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 10, 1888PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Municipal corporations. Nuisance. Statute of limitations. Constitutional!aw. Before Judge Van Epps, City court of Atlanta. March term, 1888. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Blandford, Justice.

Mrs. Atkinson, the plaintiff' in error, brought her action against, the city of Atlanta for damages, which she alleged she had sustained from the grading of certain streets and the construction of certain sewers by the city, by reason of which a large body of water was emptied upon her lots, and her property thereby injured and damaged. By an amendment to the declaration, she alleged that this was a continuing nuisance, and she proposed to recover such damages as had accrued , within four years next before the bringing of the suit. It was admitted that the work was done by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Holmes v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Sheppard v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. City of Atlanta v. DueCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. Mulligan v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API