Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Leonard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 31, 1938No. 26957PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

The plaintiff recognizes that it is a settled principle of law that the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed unless it is made to appear that the. verdict was the only one that legally could have been rendered under the law and the facts. It is insisted that a verdict for the plaintiff was demanded, and in the bill of exceptions assigning error on the judgment granting a new trial several grounds are set forth as a basis for the contention that the court erred; but before determining whether or not *578any of these grounds is meritorious, it is desirable to set forth substantially the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Austin v. Augusta Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Pause v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Bacon v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  5. Towaliga Falls Power Co. v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Provident Mutual Life Insurance v. City of AtlantaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994
  2. State Highway Department v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Cassano v. Pilgreen's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Ingram v. City of AcworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  5. Simmerman v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API