Legal Opinion
Joost v. United States Parole Commission
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 4, 1982No. 80-3110PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROGERS, District Judge.
Petitioner herein, an inmate of the United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, having been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, filed with the Clerk of the Court this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. A rule to show cause issued to which respondent filed an answer and return, and petitioner has submitted his traverse. Having examined all pleadings and materials filed, the Court makes the following findings and Order.
On January 8, 1976, petitioner was convicted in the United States District Court for the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brooks Shoe Manufacturing Co., Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, Plaintiff v. Suave Shoe Corporation, a Florida CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Douglas Charles Dufresne v. Benjamin Baer, Chairman, U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Geraghty v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Albert E. Paschal v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. BoldingDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.