Petrolene, Inc. v. City of Arnold
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
LAURANCE M. HYDE, Special Commissioner.
Action to declare an ordinance of the city void in its application to plaintiffs and to enjoin its enforcement against plaintiffs. The court found for plaintiffs and enjoined defendant from enforcing the ordinance against plaintiffs. The city has appealed and we affirm.
Plaintiffs are distributors of liquid -petroleum products, known as LPG. Defendant is a third class city. The ordinance involved provided for a license tax of five per cent of the gross receipts on public utilities “engaged in the business of supplying or furnishing electricity, electrical…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ex Parte Siemens v. ShreeveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- Automobile Club of Missouri v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- State Ex Rel. Emerson v. City of Mound CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- General Installation Company v. University CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- City of Cape Girardeau v. Fred A. Groves Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alumax Foils, Inc. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- David Ranken, Jr. Technical Institute v. BoykinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Adams v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- City of Cape Girardeau v. Harris Truck & Trailer Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- Opinion No. (1988), Missouri Attorney General Reports1988