Legal Opinion

Armando F. Sacasas, Jr. v. R.H. Rison, Warden, & U.S. Parole Commission

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 28, 1985No. 84-7568PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner in this habeas corpus proceeding alleges that the Parole Commission (“Commission”) violated his constitutional rights by failing to conduct a “termination of supervision hearing” pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 4211. The district court denied relief and petitioner appeals. We hold that petitioner was not prejudiced by the Commission’s failure to hold such a hearing and that in any event, the proper remedy for non-compliance is not a release from custody, but rather a mandamus action to compel compliance. The district court’s order denying relief is, therefore, affirmed.

I…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. Robert Pullia v. Dennis Luther, Warden, Metropolitan Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. George I. Benny v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. FriedlandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
  3. James L. Tatum v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. James J. Valona v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Mitchell v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API