Legal Opinion

Sharon McGarvey v. Penske Auto Group

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 2, 2012No. 11-2085UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FISHER, Circuit Judge.

Sharon McGarvey, Katie McGarvey, and Bryan Bechtel (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) appeal both the District Court’s dismissal of their First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim as well as its denial of their motion for leave to amend. Plaintiffs filed a putative class action in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against Penske Auto Group, Inc. (“PAG”), United Autocare Products, Inc. (“UAP”), United Autoeare, Inc. (“UA”), 1 and Innovative Aftermarket Systems (“IAS”) (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging the Defendants…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Krim M. Ballentine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  4. Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Toll Bros., Inc. v. Township of ReadingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Castro v. Sovran Self Storage, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API