Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
This appeal is from a dissolution judgment. The two major issues litigated at trial were the valuation of appellant’s interest in his law practice and the determination of respondent’s need for spousal maintenance. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
Appellant Ralph Peterson, 59, is a partner with the Minneapolis law firm of East-lund, Peterson & Solstad, Ltd. Respondent Helen Peterson, 53, has basically been a mother and homemaker throughout her nearly 24-year marriage. She has no formal education beyond high school.
Appellant joined the law firm formerly called…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Marriage of Servin v. ServinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of McClelland v. McClellandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Arundel v. ArundelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Abuzzahab v. AbuzzahabSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marriage of Hattstrom v. HattstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Moon v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Fick v. FickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Peterson v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Peterson v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985