Legal Opinion
United States v. Beverly M. Holland, AKA "Candy,"
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 23, 2004No. 03-1204PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge.
Beverly M. Holland appeals from her convictions by a jury before Judge Sessions. Holland was convicted on one conspiracy and seven substantive counts 1 under the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2421, 2422, 2423(a), and the aiding and abetting statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2, based on her interstate transportation of women in the course of her operating a Vermont-New York prostitution ring. On appeal Holland argues that the district court erred by: (i) refusing to instruct the jury that the transportation of coconspirators could not serve as the basis for a Mann Act conviction, (ii) not…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gebardi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Charles L. Jackson, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Martha Stewart and Peter BacanovicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Philip A. GiordanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Noel DavilaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. BroxmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.