Legal Opinion

Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1997No. Nos. 95-1514 and 95-1515PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

The issue before this court is whether natural-gas pipeline companies which are classified as public utilities can use a unit-appraisal method to determine the true value of their taxable personal property absent special or unusual circumstances, or whether R.C. 5727.11 requires the use of a cost-based method of valuation. For the reasons that follow, we find that R.C. 5727.11 does not preclude the use of a unit-appraisal method and, where true value is being contested, there need not be a finding of special or unusual circumstances. Accordingly, we affirm the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. R.R.Z. Associates v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Monsanto Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. WCI Steel, Inc. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Texas E. Transm. Corp. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Centerior Fuel Corp. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Centerior Fuel Corp. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API