Legal Opinion

Prairie States Petroleum Co. v. Universal Oil Sales Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 15, 1980No. 80-931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McGLOON

Universal Oil Sales Corporation and its Indiana-appointed receiver Toy Arnett were held in contempt of court for violating an order entered by the court. They were fined $5,000 per day and $2,500 per day respectively. Universal Oil Sales and Arnett appeal.

On appeal, both parties contend that (1) the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to enter the order on which the contempt charge is based; (2) Universal cannot be held in contempt because it was unable to comply with the trial court’s order; (3) Universal was denied procedural due process because the court did not hold an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Atlantic Trust Co. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. The People v. RedlichIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Defiance Water Co. v. DefianceSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. People Ex Rel. Scott v. PintozziIllinois Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Canaan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. In Re Gen-Air Plumbing & Remodeling, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  3. Hanover Insurance v. Roselle State Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API