Perry v. Champlain Oil Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.
The plaintiff’s argument according to his brief is based upon three principal propositions. First, that it is an implied provision of the lease that the defendant will do nothing to materially diminish the value of its performance and this implied provision the defendant has breached. Second, that it is an implied provision of the lease that the defendant will distribute Sunoco products to the plaintiff’s station as a Sun Oil Company station and that the impossibility of so doing gives the plaintiff a right to rescind. Third, that the cancellation of the defendant’s distributorship of Sunoco…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Barnett v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Caldwell & Taylor Corp. v. NieberhelmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
3Cited by5 opinions
- MacFarlane v. RichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- Bower v. Davis & Symonds Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Cheshire Oil Co. v. Springfield Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Private Jet Services Group, LLC, Plaintiff v. Tauck, Inc., DefendantDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2025
- Private Jet Services Group, LLC v. Tauck, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2025