Legal Opinion

State v. Breeden

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 1, 1985No. C0-85-1149PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

The State appeals from a pretrial order suppressing admission of a videotape made of Thomas Breeden after his arrest for DWI. The trial court found that Breeden’s right to counsel was violated and that the probative value of the videotape was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand with instructions.

FACTS

On Saturday, January 28, 1984, St. Paul Police Officer Tim Trooien stopped a vehicle that was driving erratically. When Officer Trooien asked the driver what was wrong, the driver replied, “I’m…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. State v. CzechSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CareyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  2. State v. KieleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. State v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. State of Minnesota v. Matthew Vaughn DiamondCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  5. State v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API