W. J. Barton Seed, Feed & Implement Co. v. Mercantile National Bank
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM WASHINGTON. Appeal from Law Court of Washington County— DaNa Harmon, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil
The facts, so far as it is necessary ^to state them, ■are as follows:
During the latter part of 1911, Toberman, Mackey ■& Co., dealers in hay and other provender in St. Louis, Mo., sold a lot of hay to Baldwin Feed & Implement Company of Johnson City, Tenn., at the price of *322$318.50. On the 4th of January, 1912, they drew a draft on Baldwin Feed & Implement Company for this sum, in favor of Mercantile National Bank, of St. Louis, with hill of lading for the goods attached thereto. This draft was deposited in the bank, a credit therefor was entered on its books for the full face .value in favor…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Third National Bank of St. Louis v. HaysTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Groveland Banking Co. v. City Nat. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
- First Nat. Bank v. Wells CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. NewsomSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.