Legal Opinion
Blessinger v. Estee Lauder Companies, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 25, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered on or about October 18, 1999, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the motion of defendants-appellants The Estee Lauder Companies, Inc., Len-Ron Mfg. Co., Inc. and Aramis, Inc. for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted in its entirety, and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants-appellants dismissing the complaint as against them.
Labor Law § 200 is a codification of the common-law duty imposed -upon an owner or general…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Comes v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Russin v. Louis N. Picciano & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Rose v. A. Servidone, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Greenfield v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Cruz v. ToscanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by5 opinions
- De La Rosa v. Philip Morris Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Nevins v. Essex Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Lukasinski v. First New Amsterdam RealtyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Marvin v. Korean Air Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Salsinha v. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010