Legal Opinion

Chamblin v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided February 28, 2000No. CIV. 98-97-JDPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

MUIRHEAD, United States Magistrate Judge.

Before me for a Report and Recommendation is the motion for attorney’s fees in excess of the statutory limit set forth in the Criminal Justice Act (“CJA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(d)(2), filed by petitioner’s appointed counsel. Counsel requests payment of $10,682.93 (consisting of $9,364.60 in fees plus $1,318.43 in costs) for representing petitioner, an Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) detainee, in his successful habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The INS contends that the CJA does not authorize the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Al Odah v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API