Legal Opinion

Wayne v. Cyphers

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, McDowell County. Action by Arthur Wayne against J. M. Cyphers and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

MilleR, Judge:

In an action of detinne plaintiff sned defendants for the possession of “one black horse mule, about seven years of age named Joe, worth $150.00, and one black horse mule about eight years old named Jack, worth $150.00”, and also' for damages for the unlawful detention thereof, laying his damages at $1200.00. Defendants’ plea was not guilty.

On the trial the verdict of the jury was, “We, the Jury, upon the issue joined find for the plaintiff the mules described in the declaration, if they can be had, and if they cannot be had, we find the value off them to be the sum of $150.00,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moss v. Campbell's Creek RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Brogan v. Union Traction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Robinson v. WoodfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Austin v. CallowayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. McGinnis v. SavageWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lowther v. Ohio Valley Oil & Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Crim v. LukenbillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Graham v. BrightWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API