Legal Opinion
State v. Lund
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 16, 1991No. C5-90-2070PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD W. SCHULTZ, Judge.
Appellant challenges his conviction for two counts of criminal vehicular operation resulting in death. Minn.Stat. § 609.21, subd. 1(1)-(2) (1988). We affirm.
FACTS
At 8:00 p.m. July 1, 1989, appellant Frank Daniel Lund, III met his cousin Tom Cunningham at Cunningham’s house. The two men went to a liquor store and returned with beer, vodka and champagne. Appellant drank vodka and mix during the evening. At approximately 11:30 p.m., after appellant had consumed between one-third to one-half of a 700 ml bottle of vodka, appellant and Cunningham went out to a local…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. OlkonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. BettinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- McGee v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. StewartConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. VanhouseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.