Maxwell v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
The only issue before this court is whether or not the court committed reversible error in refusing to allow the knife to be introduced for the consideration of the jury. It is our opinion that there is no doubt that the knife in controversy was a deadly weapon and perhaps the admissibility of the knife was doubtful. The Supreme Court said in Mitchell v. State, 71 Ga. 128, 156: “In view of the well-settled rule that penal laws are to be strictly construed in favor of the life or liberty of the accused, and that as against the State, in furtherance of the same benignant and merciful purpose,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Nix v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Jasper County v. Butts CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moore v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Claypoole v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
- Moore v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961