Legal Opinion
Provence v. Cunningham
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided January 11, 1979No. 9426PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
THE FACTS
This case is focused on the collision of a southbound motorcycle and a northbound truck on Highway 395 south of Carson City, Nevada, in which the motorcycle driver, Harold Provence, was fatally injured. A negligence action against the driver of the truck, respondent Cunningham, and his employer, respondent Outdoor Products Company, Inc., resulted in a jury verdict for defendants. The sole assignment of error by plaintiffs on appeal is that the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of an accident reconstruction expert regarding the point of impact between the truck and…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Phoenix v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Woyak v. KonieskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Tuck v. BullerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Kettle v. SmircichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Levine v. RemolifNevada Supreme Court · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- Allen v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Johnson v. EgtedarNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- Cheyenne Construction, Inc. v. HozzNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Freeman v. DavidsonNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Wright v. Las Vegas Hacienda, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.