Connor v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
TEAGUE, Judge.
“We have learned the lesson of history, ancient and modern, that a system of criminal law enforcement which comes to depend on the ‘confession’ will, in the long run, be less reliable and more subject to abuses than a system which depends on *14extrinsic evidence independently secured through skillful investigation.” Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964).
The record of this cause reflects that Walter Gilbert Conner, henceforth appellant, was convicted by the jury of committing the offense of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gipson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Mendez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Gipson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- David Andrew Mendez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- David Andrew Mendez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.