Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re McCowan

California Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1917No. Crim. No. 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

PROCEEDINGS for disbarment of an attorney at law. Kern County Bar Association, Accusant. C. V. Anderson, C. L. Claflin, Geo. B. Whitaker, F. E.. Borton, C. E. Arnold, and John S. Partridge, for Bar Association.

1Concurrence

ANGELLOTTI, C. J., Concurring.

I concur in the judgment and in the views expressed by Mr. Justice Sloss. There is ample support in the record for the conclusion that whatever of misconception of the proper scope of his functions as district attorney in his endeavor to adjust the McCutchen matter there was on the part of the accused, there was no attempt or intent to profit personally thereby, but simply a desire to see some provision made for the injured girl and the child. According to the evidence on which this conclusion was based, the undertaking of the accused was that if McCutchen would…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re McCowanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API