International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. National Right to Work Legal Defense & Education Foundation, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Once again this case is before „the Court, in this instance on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories. After careful consideration of the memoranda filed in support of and in opposition to that motion, and the able oral argument of counsel, the Court has decided to grant Plaintiffs’ Motion by Order of even date herewith. However, the matter does not end there. In their memoranda filed with the Court, the parties present divergent opinions as to the applicability of the second proviso to Section 101(a)(4) of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- R. J. Adamszewski v. Local Lodge 1487, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospaceworkers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Right to Work Legal Defense & Education Foundation, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1974
- H. B. Roberts v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
3Cited by4 opinions
- International Union UAW v. National Right to Work Legal Defense & Education Foundation, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1977
- International Union v. National Right to Work Legal Defense & Education Foundation, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- Fernandez Gonzalez v. Valdes-GarciaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
- Ransdell v. Local Lodge 1904 IAMAWDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975