Legal Opinion
International Union v. National Right to Work Legal Defense & Education Foundation, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 27, 1984No. Civ. A. 839-73PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On May 1, 1973, plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging that defendants violated § 101(a)(4) of the Labor-Management Reporting & Disclosure Act (LMRDA) which prohibits interested employers from financing, encouraging or participating in actions by a union member against his union or union officers except as a party to the litigation. 29 U.S.C. § 411(a)(4) (1976) 1 Since the plaintiffs filed this action, this case has had a long history which includes several published decisions by this Court, two published decisions by the United States Court of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Right to Work Legal Defense & Education Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Phillip M. Proctor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- In re Multi-Piece Rim Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Right to Work Legal Defense & Education Foundation, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1974
- International Union UAW v. National Right to Work Legal Defense & Education Foundation, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- International Union v. National Right to Work Legal DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- International Union v. National Right to Work Legal DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986