Legal Opinion
Riemer v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 2, 2011No. 10 C 6150PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
The plaintiff has moved pursuant to Rule 12(f), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to strike Chase’s two “Affirmative Defenses.” This follows on the heels of his successful motion to strike Chase’s original 13 Affirmative Defenses. See Riemer v. Chase Bank USA N.A., 274 F.R.D. 637 (N.D.Ill.2011).1 In pertinent part, Rule 12(f) permits a district court, on motion of a party, to “order stricken from any pleading any insufficient defense or any redundant ... matter.” The first repled defense is that Mr. Riemer authorized the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Swanson v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Salcer v. Envicon Equities Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Salcer v. Envicon Equities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- DBI Architects, P.C. v. American Express Travel-Related Services Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- First Impressions Salon, Inc. v. National Milk Producers FederationDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2016
- Allied Big R Stores, LLC v. Tea Olive I, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2020
- Cannon v. City of Anna, IllinoisDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023
- Chavez v. The City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Dunn v. SigsbeeDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.