Legal Opinion

State Industrial Insurance System v. Surman

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1987No. 16996PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent Eddie Surman injured his shoulder in a compensa-ble industrial injury on May 15, 1981. Subsequently, Surman was rated for permanent partial disability (PPD) and found to have a sixteen percent impairment. His entitlement to the PPD compensation accrued in February, 1985.

At the time Surman was injured, NRS 616.605(4)(b)(2)(II) (1979) provided that a claimant may elect to receive twenty-five percent of his compensation in a lump sum if his PPD impairment exceeded twelve percent. In 1983, the legislature changed the lump sum payment provisions to provide that claimants injured…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allen v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  2. K-Mart Corp. v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Sierra Life Insurance v. RottmanNevada Supreme Court · 1979

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gaines v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Maxwell v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. City Plan Development, Inc. v. Office of the Labor CommissionerNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Town of Eureka v. Office of the State EngineerNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State Industrial Insurance System v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API