Cultee v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
The children of William Mason Cultee, a member of the Quinault Indian Nation, seek reversal of the district court’s judgment that Cultee’s will, which omitted any mention of his children, is valid under the federal statutes that control testamentary disposition of restricted Indian lands. See 25 U.S.C. §§ 373, 464 (1976). Appellees are the United States and Helene Jake, Cultee’s cousin and an enrolled member of the Quinault Tribe, who is the sole beneficiary of Cultee’s will. This court’s jurisdiction to hear the appeal rests on 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1976). We affirm.
I
FACTS
2Cases cited3 opinions
- William Radobenko and Mary G. Radobenko, His Wife, Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Automated Equipment Corporation, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Turner v. ProdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Dolly Cusker Akers v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
3Cited by2 opinions
- Leo Williams v. William P. Clark, Secretary of the Interior, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Cultee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983