Williams v. City of Austin

ORDER

SAM SPARKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause, and specifically Plaintiff Blayne Williams’ Third Amended Complaint [# 33]; Defendant City of Austin’s Motion for Summary Judgment [# 42]; Plaintiffs Response [# 64] thereto; Defendant’s Reply [# 67] in support; and Defendant’s Objections and Motion to Strike Evidence Attached to Plaintiffs Response [# 62]1. Having considered the documents, the governing law, the arguments of the parties, and the file as a whole, the Court now enters the following opinion and orders.