Legal Opinion

Shaughnessy v. Falk

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

In this proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act the petitioner, who failed to receive a passing grade in a competitive examination for the position of assistant special deputy clerk, Supreme Court, Queens County, seeks to review the determination of the respondents who constitute the Civil Service Commission of the State of New York in fixing his mark thereon. He further seeks an order directing them to eliminate question 60 from credit consideration and to mark his answer to question 78 as correct. This would result in his attaining a passing grade. The facts are not in dispute.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Schau v. . McWilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Blumenthal v. MortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. Woernley v. Electromatic Typewriters, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Matter of Gruner v. McNamaraNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Cavanagh v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fernandes v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  2. Kurtz v. KroneNew York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API