State v. Peekema
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
A jury convicted defendants-adverse parties (defendants) of the misdemeanor offenses of unlawful disposal of hazardous waste in the second degree and unlawful storage of hazardous waste in the second degree. The issue in this original proceeding in mandamus is whether the trial court erred in granting defendants’ post-verdict motion to dismiss those charges. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the trial court lacked authority to dismiss the charges.
Defendant Peekema is an employee of defendant Stevens Equipment Company. Defendants were charged in separate indictments with two counts…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Fidanque v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Carlile v. FrostOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Penn v. NorbladOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Redden v. Van HoomissenOregon Supreme Court · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. VoghCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Kaino v. Oregon Commission on Judicial Fitness & DisabilityOregon Supreme Court · 2003