Ballard v. Asset Recovery Management Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
The defendants1 appeal from a $22,500 judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. The trial court rendered judgment after granting the plaintiffs’ motion for summary enforcement of a settlement agreement. The defendants assert that such summary enforcement is improper because (1) the agreement does not comply with the statute of frauds, (2) the agreement is not the product of a “meeting of the minds,” (3) the dispute over the terms of the agreement required an evidentiary hearing, (4) the plaintiffs failed to satisfy a condition precedent to the defendants’ obligation to pay the *807agreed amount and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Audubon Parking Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Barclay & Stubbs, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Bowman v. 1477 Central Avenue Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Thompson & Peck, Inc. v. Harbor Marine Contracting Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Connecticut Co. v. DIVISION 425Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Thomsen v. Aqua Massage International, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- DAP Financial Management Co. v. Mor-Fam Electric, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Matos v. OrtizConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Carpenter v. MontanaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Ballard v. Asset Recovery Management Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.