Legal Opinion

Doyle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 23, 1994No. Nos. 94-1179, 94-1713PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKDULL, Judge.

By this consolidated appeal defendant seeks review of the trial court’s summary denial of a Rule 3.800 motion to correct an illegal sentence, and seeks to correct his judgment and sentence to reflect that he plead nolo contendere to a violation of section 784.021, Florida Statutes, rather than a violation of section 784.07, Florida Statutes, as reflected in the final judgment.

Upon confession of error by the state we return this case to the trial court with directions to correct defendant’s judgment to reflect that defendant plead nolo contendere to a violation of section…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goss v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Render v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Stites v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Starr Tyme, Inc. v. CohenSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Allen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API