Legal Opinion

Klee v. E. H. Steele Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 27, 1895No. 9031PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action by members of the firm of Klee & Wallach, and others, against E. H. Steele Company, a corporation, and the stockholders thereof, to obtain the appointment of a receiver. From an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Jamison, J., appointing a receiver, defendant corporation appealed. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This is an appeal by a corporation organized under the general laws of the state for the purpose of dealing in real, personal, and mixed property, but which had never been engaged in anything but merchandising, from an order appointing a receiver in an action brought by general creditors in their own behalf and in behalf of other creditors who might choose to come into the action, as provided by G. S. 1894, c. 76, §§ 5889-5911. On the complaint and certain affidavits the order to show cause was issued April 10, 1894, returnable April 12. The defendant appeared on the return day, and resisted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McKusick v. Seymour, Sabin & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Olson v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. State v. Bank of New EnglandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Walther v. Seven Corners BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. International Trust Co. v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Greenfield v. Hill City Land, Loan & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. Minneapolis Paper Co. v. Swinburne Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. American Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Farmers & Merchants State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API