Rosenfield v. Bevill
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Justice.
This is a second appeal, the sufficiency of appellee’s pleading as a bill of review having been determined in Bevill v. Rosenfield, Tex.Civ.App., 113 S.W.2d 340, to which we refer for nature of the case and law points involved. Plaintiff, Frank Bev-ill, again stood for trial upon the same pleading (second amended original petition), to which special exceptions were urged and sustained to all allegations of fraud-and for recovery of the $800 fee in question. This left in the case no issue save the validity vel non of the probate court order, appointing appellant as attorney for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Levy v. RoperTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- August Kern Barber Supply Co. v. FreezeTexas Supreme Court · 1903
- Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. NobleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- San Bernardo Townsite Co. v. HockerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Bevill v. RosenfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bevill v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942