Legal Opinion

Bevill v. Young

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1942No. 13290PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Justice.

The matters here involved have been the subject of two previous appeals, Bevill v. Rosenfield, Tex.Civ.App., 113 S.W.2d 340; Rosenfield v. Bevill, Tex.Civ.App., 143 S.W.2d 414; and the material facts of those cases are referred to for brevity. The effect of prior litigation was-to declare void the appointment by the Probate Court of Max R. Rosenfield as attorney for Frank Bevill, an admittedly missing heir in the will proceedings then pending in the Dallas County Probate Court, styled “In Re Estate of Paul Plenry Bevill, Deceased.” Harold Young, administrator of the estate, had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Stewart v. MorrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Hurley v. HirschCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Bevill v. RosenfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Buie-Crawford Co. v. Cleburne Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kubena v. HatchTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Bilek v. TupaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Eubanks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. in the Estate of Robert Jerry Brazda, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API