Legal Opinion

Steinmetz v. Call Realty, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 29, 2001No. 19033-1-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

A trial judge must enter findings on the material facts of a suit. She must also make conclusions of law setting out the legal reasons for her judgment. RALJ 5.2(b). However, a written opinion or memorandum of a decision is sufficient if findings of fact and conclusions of law are included. RALJ 5.2(b). In this negligence and breach of contract suit, a district court judge filed a three-page “letter opinion” which spelled out both findings and conclusions, albeit in a nontraditional form. Because the appellant, Michael A. Steinmetz, filed a motion for reconsideration more than 10 days after…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Doran Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  3. Shields v. Sta-Fit, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. Nicacio v. Yakima Chief Ranches, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Morgan Bros. v. Haskell Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of TahatCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Mark Haffner v. Ivar R. AlmCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API