Legal Opinion
Keppler v. Hinsdale Township High School District 86
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 20, 1989No. 88 C 8506PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRIAN BARNETT DUFF, District Judge.
Plaintiff Rose Keppler has sued Roger Miller and Hinsdale Township High School District 86 (“District 86”) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., and under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“§ 1983”). She alleges sexual discrimination and due process violations, but what she really wants is to make others pay for her mistakes. She will not succeed here.
FACTS
District 86 has two high schools: Hins-dale Central and Hinsdale South. The Superintendent for District 86 controls the day-to-day affairs of both…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Hortencia Bohen v. City of East Chicago, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Joseph Succar v. Dade County School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Perks v. Town of HuntingtonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Laughinghouse v. RisserDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Schonauer v. DCR Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Mauro v. OrvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.