Legal Opinion

The Titanic

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 4, 1915PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Oil application for a writ of prohibition on the part of the petitioner prohibiting Judge Mayer from entering orders withdrawing claims and permitting suits to be brought in England.

1Opinion of the Court

OOXE, Circuit Judge.

Three claimants ask permission to withdraw the claims filed by them in this proceeding. Judge Mayer has indicated his intention to permit this to be done .and the present proceeding seeks an order prohibiting such action. Substantially the same questions arc involved in each claim, but, in the view which we take of the law, it will be only necessary to consider the claim of Hilda Mary Facón, which presents the question freed from unnecessary complications.

Hilda Mary Lacón is a British subject residing at Halifax, Nova Scotia. Her claim is for $3,464 for loss of baggage and…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. The 84-HCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  2. Petition of Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, SADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  3. Petition of United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1969
  4. Algoma Central & Hudson Bay Ry. Co. v. Great Lakes Transit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  5. Petition of Bloomfield Steamship Company, Petitioner-Appellant-Appellee, Shapiro & Whitehouse, Inc., Taylor Instrument Co., Claimants-Appellants. Petition of A/s J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi, Bloomfield Steamship Company, Claimant-Appellant (And 2 Other Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API