In Re Kerr
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This appeal is from an adjudication of dependency of two children. Appellant, the natural mother of the two minors, contends that the juvenile court was without jurisdiction over this case when it failed to hold the adjudicatory hearing within the statutorily prescribed period. 1 We hold that the consequence of a tardy hearing is the automatic activation of the right of the child and its parents to the immediate release of the child from the state’s custody; it is not, as appellant argues, the loss of the court’s jurisdiction over the case. Order affirmed.
sH Sj« S}C Sj! Sji
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In the Interest of DelSignoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. Barfod (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Hemenway v. HemenwaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Kohn v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Nemeth v. NemethSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3Cited by6 opinions
- DB v. State, Department of Family ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- In the Interest of R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- In the Interest of J.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In the Interest of S.N.W.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- In the Interest of CrawfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.