Legal Opinion

State v. Hohman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1991No. 90CA004922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cacioppo, Judge.

Appellant, Clifford J. Hohman, appeals from his conviction on one count of felonious assault, in violation of R.C. 2903.11(A)(1). Hohman asserts five assignments of error. We affirm.

Assignment of Error No. I

“The trial court erred in admitting evidence of so called ‘mace tests’ conducted by Police Officer Baxter.”

Hohman contends that the trial court erred by permitting a police officer to testify regarding an experiment he performed to determine the time period required for traces of mace to dissipate. The officer’s testimony was that he sprayed himself with mace on two…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. BridgemanOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. City of Dayton v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. City of Columbus v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GrinnellOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State v. ReedOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. PerryOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. FurmageOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API