Legal Opinion

Nolan v. Glynn

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 12, 1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Madison District Court. — Lorin N. Hays, Judge. Action against sureties 'on a supersedeas bond. The opinion shows the facts. A demurrer to petition was sustained, and plaintiff’s petition dismissed. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

This appeal is from the action of the court in sustaining a demurrer to a petition filed by the plaintiff, in which she alleges the following facts as a basis for recovery :

On the 20th day of November, 1911, she obtained judgment against the defendant William H. Glynn. On the 15th day of February, 1912, the said William H. Glynn, defendant, appealed to the Supreme Court from the judgment so rendered, and for the purpose of staying further pro*22ceedings on said judgment, executed a bond, the material provisions of which are as follows:

“Now if the said appellant, W. H. Glynn, shall pay to said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rothgerber v. WonderlyIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Chase v. RiesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Jackson v. Lawyers' Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. Lehman v. Amsterdam Coffee Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Janeway v. HaftSuperior Court of Buffalo · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crozier v. Freeman Coal Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1936
  2. United States v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API