Legal Opinion
Cathay Pacific Airways, Ltd. v. Fly and See Travel, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 5, 1998No. 90 Civ. 0371(JES), 90 Civ. 0372(JES) and 90 Civ. 5049(JES)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Cathay Pacific Airways, Ltd. (“Cathay”), Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. (“Hawaiian”), and Garuda Indonesia (“Garuda”) bring the above-captioned related actions against deféndants Fly and See Travel, Inc. (“Fly & See”) and Chaim Werdyger (“Werdyger”), each claiming violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(1), (4), (5), 1962(a)-(c),' common law fraud, breach of contract, breach of agency, unjust, enrichment, conversion, and New York General Business Law § 158.
The three above-captioned…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jeffrey Hecht v. Commerce Clearing House, Inc., William Miller, Louis Ceccoli, and Stanley StephensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Richard D. BENNETT and Carole A. Bennett, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Marine Midland Bank v. John E. Russo Produce Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- First Nationwide Bank v. Gelt Funding Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Laub v. FaesselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Jackson v. Mishkin (In Re Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Mishkin Ex Rel. Liquidation of the Business of Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp. v. Ensminger (In Re Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Oak Beverages, Inc. v. TOMRA of Massachusetts, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000