Legal Opinion

Schobinger v. Ivey

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1991No. Civ. 900315PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Justice.

Jack Schobinger appeals from a district court judgment dismissing on its merits his action against Roland Michael Ivey. We affirm.

On October 31, 1988, Schobinger’s vehicle, which was being operated by his stepdaughter Tara Mathis, collided with a vehicle operated by Ivey in Grand Forks. There was negligible damage to Ivey’s vehicle and extensive damage to Schobinger’s vehicle.

Schobinger sued Ivey for the damage to his vehicle. The trial court found each driver to be 50% negligent and imputed Tara’s negligence to Schobinger under the “family purpose doctrine”. Schobinger argues…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Herman v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ulman v. LindemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Michaelsohn Ex Rel. Michaelsohn v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Brower v. StolzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WanzekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Nelson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. McPhee v. TuftyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Moore v. Fargo Public School District No. 1North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Rudolph v. N.D. Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API